Skip to content

Management Consulting Case Study-Under-Performance in the Australian Automobile Industry

Management Consulting Case Study-Under-Performance in the Australian Automobile Industry

Background

You've been engaged by one of the prominent "big three" automobile manufacturers in Australia. Over the past few years, your client's performance, measured in terms of profitability, has lagged behind competitors. All three companies, including your client, have introduced cars based on Japanese designs in collaboration with smaller Japanese automakers. These cars are sold both in Japan and Australia, with the primary distinction being the place of manufacture and the model names (badges). Your task is to uncover the reasons behind your client's under-performance compared to competitors.

Also read, the case study on Declining Sales in the Scientific Instrument Industry

Key Considerations:

  1. Identifying the Cause of Under-Performance: Investigate the potential factors leading to your client's under-performance. This could encompass product differences, market segments, sales and distribution issues, product quality, high expenses, or production costs.

  2. Analyzing Cost Structure: Examine the cost structure of your client's operations and identify the sources of higher costs compared to other automobile manufacturers. Utilize management accounts, financial reports, data from the American holding company, and reverse engineering to gain insights.

  3. Understanding Design Costs: Recognize that design costs constitute a significant portion of the overall costs. Assess whether your client's design costs differ from competitors and if these costs impact their cost structure.

  4. Investigate Joint Venture Terms: Explore the terms of the joint venture between your client and the Japanese automaker. Determine whether the terms are similar to those of your competitors.

  5. Proportional Design Costs: Investigate how design costs are shared between the joint venture parties. Assess whether the client's share of design costs is significantly larger and the reasons behind this difference.

Final Analysis

To address the under-performance in the Australian automobile industry:

  • Cause Identification: Analyze the potential factors contributing to your client's under-performance. Your examination should lead to the discovery that high production costs are a significant issue.

  • Cost Structure Assessment: Investigate the cost structure of your client's operations relative to competitors. This exploration should reveal the importance of design costs.

  • Design Cost Impact: Recognize that design costs are the key cost driver. Determine that the design costs are not inherently higher for your client; however, the significant Japanese market share of the partner results in proportionally higher design costs allocated to your client.

Your solution lies in revising the terms of the joint venture to address the disproportionate sharing of design costs, thus enhancing your client's competitiveness and profitability.

Those looking to pave their way in the field of consulting can upskill themselves with our courses

Frequently asked questions

Why is the Australian automobile manufacturer underperforming?

The underperformance is primarily due to higher production costs compared to competitors. A key issue is the disproportionate share of design costs allocated to your client in a joint venture, driven by the larger Japanese market share of its partner.

How do joint venture terms affect automobile profitability?

Unfavorable joint venture terms can result in unequal cost sharing. In this case, your client bears a higher share of design costs, negatively impacting its overall cost structure and profitability compared to other manufacturers.

Are the design costs actually higher for the client?

No, the design costs are not inherently higher. However, due to joint venture terms, a disproportionate portion is allocated to your client because the partner benefits more from sales in the Japanese market.

Why is analyzing cost structure important in auto consulting?

Understanding the cost structure helps identify inefficiencies. It reveals which components—like design, production, or raw materials—are inflating expenses. In this case, design costs are the key driver of underperformance.

What solution can improve the client’s performance?

Renegotiating joint venture terms to ensure fair distribution of design costs is essential. This would reduce the client’s cost burden, enhance competitiveness, and help improve long-term profitability in the Australian automobile market.

automobile industryjoint venturecost structuredesign costmanagement consultingauto manufacturingprofitability strategy
Devang Johari
Written by

Devang Johari

Senior Writer · LinkedIn

Join 5,00,000+ Subscribers

Be a part of our ever growing community.

Having an Issue!!

Please tells us more about it!

Help